Nelson Fretenburg, Isaac Liedemann, Mathias Lynch-Staunton, Marcus Mayer and Mimi Zanker
- Degree:
- Bachelor of Applied Science
- Program:
- Campus: Vancouver
Our project
Backcountry skiing is becoming increasingly popular, but unfortunately deaths caused by avalanches are also increasing. When someone is buried in an avalanche, they have a rescue window of under 10 to 15 minutes. In large avalanche debris fields – which can span multiple square kilometres – rescuers rely on time-consuming grid searching to pick up beacon signals that have a limited range of 70 metres.
We designed and built AviMarmot, a survival device that autonomously burrows from the buried skier to the surface of the snow, where it then releases a high-visibility marker to guide rescuers to the victim.
This high-visibility signal can be seen from hundreds of metres away and dramatically shortens rescue times to save lives.
The technical challenges we faced
A lot of engineering work builds off existing research or technologies. This was not the case for our project. We could not find a single example of a robot that can burrow through snow, which is a very complicated medium due to its variability and non-linear properties. There are very few – if any – equations describing how snow behaves during the mechanical loading that occurs as the robot burrows.
Early on in this project we met with a glaciologist at UBC and avalanche forecaster at Avalanche Canada, who confirmed the lack of equations and data, instead suggesting that we rely on experimental testing and our intuition.
The device needs to be able to cut away hard snow in front of it and displace that snow behind it. We tested many options before arriving at our final design. For example, our original plan was a helical compression screw, similar to a lag bolt. This design was not successful, which led us to a more complicated track and drill set up; however, this more complicated design had numerous technical issues. During horizontal drilling, the snow packed into the evacuation channels, causing the drill motor to stall frequently, our 3D-printed components weren’t strong enough…the list goes on!
Testing posed logistical challenges. Although we did some load testing in the lab, we needed data in the field. That meant assembling a full prototype and then – in a year where Vancouver didn’t have any snow – driving up to Cypress Mountain and Seymour Mountain where we could test our device in a variety of snow conditions.
There were many disappointing test days, although they all gave us useful information for further modifications to improve success rates.
What’s next for our project
We have a follow-up meeting with Avalanche Canada to share our results. There’s a lot of additional work that would need to be done to develop this into a marketable survival device, including weight and size reduction, improved performance through material selection, and integration of the visual indication system.

